Kolegij
Studiji
Sociologija - Upravljanje i javne politikePovijest
Diplomski sveučilišni studij Povijest (nastavnički)
Komunikologija - Interkulturalna komunikacija i novinarstvo
Komunikologija - Znanstveno istraživanje medija i odnosi s javnošću
Psihologija
Sestrinstvo
Sestrinstvo
Studijska godina
1ISVU ID
172525ECTS
4
The aim of this course is to explore the normative and formative
dimension of memory. The course starts with the representation of
history of memory (pointing out to the most prominent authors in the
field) and then engages with the recurring ethical questions pertaining
to the uses of the past: whether we have any ethical obligation to
remember (e.g. the “memory imperative” driven by delayed reactions
to the atrocities of the World War II and Holocaust); what we should
remember and who are the (co)creators of collective memory”; how
should we employ memories; and what are the ethical criteria for the
uses of the past and right measure between too much and too little
memory. The course focuses on both individual and collective
memory and on a diachronic dimension of coping with the past,
which is not only backward-looking but also future-oriented (identity
polices, reconciliation, lustration laws, transitional justice, ecc.).
Evaluate the phenomenon of memory as a medium and its
communicative dimension. Identify ways in which public and media
memory influences the construction of personal and ethnic identity.
Highlight the role of media and interpersonal communication in
preventing political, religious or ethnic memory abuse.
Misztal, B. A. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering, Philadelphia:
Open University Press.
Margalit, A. (2004). The Ethics of Memory, Cambridge London:
Harvard University Press.
Connerton, P. (1989.) How Societies Remember, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Blustein, J. (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; Todorov, T. (2001). Gli abusi della
memoria, Napoli: Ipermedium Libri; Halbwachs, M. (1987). La
memoria collettiva, Milano: Unicopoli; Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory,
History, Forgetting. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago
Press; Booth, J. W. (2006). Communities of Memory: On Witness,
Identity, and Justice, Ithaca: Cornell University Press; Brkljačić M.,
Prlenda, S. (2006). Kultura pamćenja i historija, Zagreb: Golden
Marketing- Thenička knjiga. Volf, M. (2012). Zrcalo sjećanja. Ispravno
pamćenje u nasilnu svijetu, Rijeka: Ex Libris; Assman, J. (2005.)
Kulturno pamćenje, Zenica: Vrijema;
1. Class Attendance: mandatory 70% attendance is required;
2. Seminar Assignments: in-class presentation and seminar
paper;
A minimum of 35% of the grade should be acquired
through regular course activities: seminar assignments and
two midterm exams
1. Course activities: seminar assignments; Midterm Exam 1
(written), Midterm Exam 2 (written)
Final Exam (oral)
Grading Scale:
Failure (1) – 0 do 49,9%
Satisfactory (2) – 50 do 64,9%
Good (3) – 65 do 79,9%
Very Good (4) – 80 do 89,9%
Excellent (5) – 90 do 100%
Final Grade Calculation:
1. a) In-class Activities – 70%
1) Seminar Assignments – 20%
2) Mid term 1 – 25%
3) Mid term 2 – 25%
b) Final Exam – 30%
| VRSTA AKTIVNOSTI | ECTS bodovi - koeficijent opterećenja studenata | UDIO OCJENE (%) |
| Pohađanje nastave | 1.2 | 0 |
| Seminarsko izlaganje | 0.6 | 20 |
| Kolokvij-međuispit | 0.7 | 25 |
| Kolokvij-međuispit | 0.7 | 25 |
| Ukupno tijekom nastave | 3.2 | 70 |
| Završni ispit | 0.8 | 30 |
| UKUPNO BODOVA (nastava+zav.ispit) | 4 | 100 |
The aim of this course is to explore the normative and formative
dimension of memory. The course starts with the representation of
history of memory (pointing out to the most prominent authors in the
field) and then engages with the recurring ethical questions pertaining
to the uses of the past: whether we have any ethical obligation to
remember (e.g. the “memory imperative” driven by delayed reactions
to the atrocities of the World War II and Holocaust); what we should
remember and who are the (co)creators of collective memory”; how
should we employ memories; and what are the ethical criteria for the
uses of the past and right measure between too much and too little
memory. The course focuses on both individual and collective
memory and on a diachronic dimension of coping with the past,
which is not only backward-looking but also future-oriented (identity
polices, reconciliation, lustration laws, transitional justice, ecc.).
Evaluate the phenomenon of memory as a medium and its
communicative dimension. Identify ways in which public and media
memory influences the construction of personal and ethnic identity.
Highlight the role of media and interpersonal communication in
preventing political, religious or ethnic memory abuse.
Misztal, B. A. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering, Philadelphia:
Open University Press.
Margalit, A. (2004). The Ethics of Memory, Cambridge London:
Harvard University Press.
Connerton, P. (1989.) How Societies Remember, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Blustein, J. (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; Todorov, T. (2001). Gli abusi della
memoria, Napoli: Ipermedium Libri; Halbwachs, M. (1987). La
memoria collettiva, Milano: Unicopoli; Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory,
History, Forgetting. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago
Press; Booth, J. W. (2006). Communities of Memory: On Witness,
Identity, and Justice, Ithaca: Cornell University Press; Brkljačić M.,
Prlenda, S. (2006). Kultura pamćenja i historija, Zagreb: Golden
Marketing- Thenička knjiga. Volf, M. (2012). Zrcalo sjećanja. Ispravno
pamćenje u nasilnu svijetu, Rijeka: Ex Libris; Assman, J. (2005.)
Kulturno pamćenje, Zenica: Vrijema;
1. Class Attendance: mandatory 70% attendance is required;
2. Seminar Assignments: in-class presentation and seminar
paper;
A minimum of 35% of the grade should be acquired
through regular course activities: seminar assignments and
two midterm exams
1. Course activities: seminar assignments; Midterm Exam 1
(written), Midterm Exam 2 (written)
Final Exam (oral)
Grading Scale:
Failure (1) – 0 do 49,9%
Satisfactory (2) – 50 do 64,9%
Good (3) – 65 do 79,9%
Very Good (4) – 80 do 89,9%
Excellent (5) – 90 do 100%
Final Grade Calculation:
1. a) In-class Activities – 70%
1) Seminar Assignments – 20%
2) Mid term 1 – 25%
3) Mid term 2 – 25%
b) Final Exam – 30%
| VRSTA AKTIVNOSTI | ECTS bodovi - koeficijent opterećenja studenata | UDIO OCJENE (%) |
| Pohađanje nastave | 1.2 | 0 |
| Seminarsko izlaganje | 0.6 | 20 |
| Kolokvij-međuispit | 0.7 | 25 |
| Kolokvij-međuispit | 0.7 | 25 |
| Ukupno tijekom nastave | 3.2 | 70 |
| Završni ispit | 0.8 | 30 |
| UKUPNO BODOVA (nastava+zav.ispit) | 4 | 100 |
The aim of this course is to explore the normative and formative
dimension of memory. The course starts with the representation of
history of memory (pointing out to the most prominent authors in the
field) and then engages with the recurring ethical questions pertaining
to the uses of the past: whether we have any ethical obligation to
remember (e.g. the “memory imperative” driven by delayed reactions
to the atrocities of the World War II and Holocaust); what we should
remember and who are the (co)creators of collective memory”; how
should we employ memories; and what are the ethical criteria for the
uses of the past and right measure between too much and too little
memory. The course focuses on both individual and collective
memory and on a diachronic dimension of coping with the past,
which is not only backward-looking but also future-oriented (identity
polices, reconciliation, lustration laws, transitional justice, ecc.).
Evaluate the phenomenon of memory as a medium and its
communicative dimension. Identify ways in which public and media
memory influences the construction of personal and ethnic identity.
Highlight the role of media and interpersonal communication in
preventing political, religious or ethnic memory abuse.
Misztal, B. A. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering, Philadelphia:
Open University Press.
Margalit, A. (2004). The Ethics of Memory, Cambridge London:
Harvard University Press.
Connerton, P. (1989.) How Societies Remember, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Blustein, J. (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; Todorov, T. (2001). Gli abusi della
memoria, Napoli: Ipermedium Libri; Halbwachs, M. (1987). La
memoria collettiva, Milano: Unicopoli; Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory,
History, Forgetting. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago
Press; Booth, J. W. (2006). Communities of Memory: On Witness,
Identity, and Justice, Ithaca: Cornell University Press; Brkljačić M.,
Prlenda, S. (2006). Kultura pamćenja i historija, Zagreb: Golden
Marketing- Thenička knjiga. Volf, M. (2012). Zrcalo sjećanja. Ispravno
pamćenje u nasilnu svijetu, Rijeka: Ex Libris; Assman, J. (2005.)
Kulturno pamćenje, Zenica: Vrijema;
1. Class Attendance: mandatory 70% attendance is required;
2. Seminar Assignments: in-class presentation and seminar
paper;
A minimum of 35% of the grade should be acquired
through regular course activities: seminar assignments and
two midterm exams
1. Course activities: seminar assignments; Midterm Exam 1
(written), Midterm Exam 2 (written)
Final Exam (oral)
Grading Scale:
Failure (1) – 0 do 49,9%
Satisfactory (2) – 50 do 64,9%
Good (3) – 65 do 79,9%
Very Good (4) – 80 do 89,9%
Excellent (5) – 90 do 100%
Final Grade Calculation:
1. a) In-class Activities – 70%
1) Seminar Assignments – 20%
2) Mid term 1 – 25%
3) Mid term 2 – 25%
b) Final Exam – 30%
| VRSTA AKTIVNOSTI | ECTS bodovi - koeficijent opterećenja studenata | UDIO OCJENE (%) |
| Pohađanje nastave | 1.2 | 0 |
| Seminarsko izlaganje | 0.6 | 20 |
| Kolokvij-međuispit | 0.7 | 25 |
| Kolokvij-međuispit | 0.7 | 25 |
| Ukupno tijekom nastave | 3.2 | 70 |
| Završni ispit | 0.8 | 30 |
| UKUPNO BODOVA (nastava+zav.ispit) | 4 | 100 |