1. Describe the diagnostic approach and diagnostic workup of the patient.

2. Explain biological variations and their impact on the biochemical composition of body fluids.

3. Relate the type of container to the sample for laboratory testing.

4. Compile a list of all potential preanalytical errors.

5. Demonstrate patient preparation for individual laboratory tests.

6. Distinguish preanalytical error and/or interference from pathological findings.

7. Categorize laboratory tests according to urgency.

8. Compare the results obtained with reference intervals, critical values, and the patient's health status.

9. Analyze the results obtained on POC devices.

Topić E. i sur. Medicinska biokemija i laboratorijska medicina ukliničkoj praksi. Medicinska naklada, Zagreb, 2018.

1. Lenicek Krleza J, Dorotic A, Grzunov A, Maradin M. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Capillary blood sampling: national recommendations for the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2015;25(3):335-58.
2. Simundic at al. Recommendation for venous blood sampling. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56(12):2015-38. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0602.
3. Lenicek Krleza J, Honovic L, Vlasic Tanaskovic J, Podolar S, Rimac V, Jokic A, Post-analytical laboratory work: national recommendations from the Working Group for Post-analytics on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. BiochemMed (Zagreb) 2019;29(2):020502.

1. Regular class attendance (at least 80% attendance)

2. Properly completed seminar obligations

Continuous evaluation of student work through:
1. Teaching activities: 10-minute seminar presentation
2. Final exam (written)

Continuous evaluation of student work in addition to regular class attendance (which is a requirement for taking the exam), adding points for active participation in seminars and the results of the written exam result in an overall grade as follows: sufficient (2): 60-69 points; good (3): 70-79 points; very good (4): 80-89 points; excellent (5): 90-100 points.